Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
警察踩灰是肯定要出问题的，不踩，案子办不了。
喜欢这种小溪流水似的叙事风格，应该继续往下拍…
很平淡，平淡得如同一篇流水账。
泛黄的书页里找到了父亲。
剧情太老套了，设定也太老套了，在韩国满是犯罪电影，这里的设定依然同质化，甚至毫无新意。剧情人物反转都能猜到，小男主的演技很中规中矩，赵震雄的角色也是比较脸谱化。
平静的深夜，配一瓶不那么凉的好酒，这片子很合适。温柔，酒吧，第一次对酒吧有了向往。人生就是这样，发力早晚不同而已，学霸不代表永远，北大毕业也有卖猪肉的。
克鲁尼，你改行做导演是为了啥呢，为了让另一个改行做过导演的重拾导演自信吗......下次拍104分钟舅舅带娃吧，礼貌四星
舅舅充当了爸爸的角色，很温馨，很平淡但就是过于匆匆了，可能是部剧会更好看些，舅舅的话，男人一定要有一辆车。
平静的深夜，配一瓶不那么凉的好酒，这片子很合适。温柔，酒吧，第一次对酒吧有了向往。人生就是这样，发力早晚不同而已，学霸不代表永远，北大毕业也有卖猪肉的。
3.5 不仅独自撑起一个酒吧，还得撑起一部电影，舅舅不容易啊。
韩国男演员都越老越有魅力啊，小崔加油… 剧情真一般… 朴大叔一个工具人，real知天命爱豆了啊，宣传主力咯，恭喜～
2.5。UNCLE CHARLIE加分，故事太温柔太平淡太无聊，舔狗这条线莫名其妙。
不冷不热的警界“无间道”片长又太自信120分钟，有些搂不住。用这个片子来说明，没有女主角真的很丢分！
这部电影可能更多的意义是提供了回忆录视角：如果当下已经足够难堪，何不回头遥看来时的人们如何珍视。大本最后一幕戏就像他在《心灵捕手》里一样动人。“不要回来”。
窝在沙发上脑袋放空 喜欢70～80s的一切🤩
《温柔酒吧》是颁奖季电影里最平淡也是最温馨的一部，充满了爱与希望
冲着克鲁尼和阿弗莱克去看的，Jr不管是小时候还是长大后都长着一张不讨喜的face....
赵震雄又胖回来了，这部完成度比较高，剧情也比较商业化，看的途中都忍不住站队赵和崔，动作戏也还可以，最后的剧情落入俗套，可能还是演员演的比较出色吧！挺吸引人的，可以说无尿点，但是不值得二刷
有一个很不错的故事，但拍到后面就感觉每条线都仓促，甚至高潮也没有了高潮的样子。
温柔是挺温柔的，不温不火也是平平无奇的原因
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
