Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
上一次看这么带感的电影还是《硬核亨利》。4星给直接。没有连篇累牍的文戏，上来就干，通篇流畅打斗。公主敏系定位，全程开挂，长镜头动作戏调皮又灵活快意，游戏感强，细节又足够R，真要说遗憾就是缺了个连续换装。要是《美少女特工队》、《花木兰》这么痛快，又岂会风评仆仆。
从头打到尾，像一个闯关游戏，不知为何分数这么低，打个五星吧！
动作类大女主爽文，拳拳到肉，血腥又暴力，看着特别爽，最后好人一个都没死，不错。
完全是游戏的设定，从塔顶打到塔底。然后还加了一条女性主义的线索。动作戏还是可以看看的。其它无法深究。琳不错，还以为是华人，原来是越南人。
爆米花电影，本以为纯喜剧没想到还有爱情，韩孝周又美又飒，爱了
反派领盒饭是因为废话太多，公主就像打了鸡血，靠一身蛮力，从头打到尾，硬钢壮汉
感觉画面挺好，笑料也有，虽然最后作弊赢得单挑哈哈。
I'm the fucking fight princess
典型的欧洲中世纪打斗风格，女主一路都很强，一人能灭一整个军队，最后直接干掉BOSS，剧情可以略过不看，因为猜都猜得到。
即使服化道再精细，特效再逼真，美帝这几十年来的青少年电影始终摆脱不了演技浮夸剧情弱智的标签
尽管逻辑偶有不畅，制作也略显粗糙，但在银幕上看见独立自强、一路血战的公主形象也太惊喜了。
前半段的剪辑有点混乱，而且情节很一般，最后一段才开始燃起来。光洙对于搞笑的角色驾轻就熟，仿佛在看RM；姜河那本片演技最佳
爆米花电影，本以为纯喜剧没想到还有爱情，韩孝周又美又飒，爱了
这…姜河那韩孝周带不起来的剧情…还不如出差十五夜快乐
网飞又瞎几把投资了，这部虽然打着亚洲版第二部《加勒比海盗》，其实算是软重启。（演员全换，剧本从三线叙事变正邪对峙）演员方面:男主姜河那没有前作金南佶这么洒脱，（虽然还是比不上约翰德普，但也算半斤八两）女主就更不用说了，孙艺珍完爆韩秀周几条街。唯一算得上亮点的也就一筐猪的加盟，插科打诨完全放弃男模形象，也是为了合家欢强行推动剧情。（彻底变谐星）至于剧本方面:看做是部《夺宝奇兵》就行了。（没有任何悬念与惊喜，尿点满满不如看一筐猪耍宝）最后，希望不会再有第三部吧，网飞投资真是越来越拉了。（原片两星，一筐猪再加一星）
还可以的升级打怪爽剧啦，而且那一段威胁坏boss的台词还挺有力量的(^^)
作为爆米花喜剧片看还可以，比一些国内制造尴尬笑点的喜剧片好看。
有点扯，入侵的士兵全是傻子，公主体力无限….
中世纪宫廷版女战狼。女主全程散发糙汉气质，不依靠任何智谋，硬是用武力灭了整个军队，光环更是亮瞎了眼。简单的故事框架，加之窜稀般的故事推进，90分钟看着就像半个小时的短片，看完啥都不记得。不过密集的打斗场面看着还是挺爽的，也有一些不错的动作编排，让它变得值得一看。
作为搞笑冒险类型的电影它成功了一半，画面也是上乘，可惜剧情和剪辑太差
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
