Umberto Lenzi is undoubtedly the king of Italian crime movies, but unfortunately; Syndicate Sadists is not the best examples of his work in this genre. Lenzi's crime flicks tend to be a cut above the rest because he makes films based on stories with a point, and they don't lack direction; but this film feels a bit too wayward to fully fit with the rest of his stuff. The film takes obvious influence from Sergio Leone's landmark western 'A Fistful of Dollars' (which in turn, took influence from Akira Kurosawa's landmark samurai flick Yojimbo), in that it features two warring families and a strong character at the centre. The crime that Lenzi focuses on is kidnapping, and we centre on a character called 'Rambo'. Rambo is dragged into the war between the two families after his brother is killed because of it. Rambo uses his brains and brawn to pit the two families against one another, in the hope of gaining revenge for his brother's death, rescuing a young boy that they've kidnapped, and ultimately letting the two sides destroy one another.
The film's biggest asset is undoubtedly Tomas Milian. Milian was put to great use by Lenzi in almost all of his crime thrillers. The range of characters he has played for Lenzi is immense, and this one is easily one of the coolest. The character is called Rambo, which immediately sprang to mind the popular Sylvester Stallone character - but for once, the Italians actually haven't stolen this name as Syndicate Sadists was released first! As usual, the film is wickedly entertaining, as we get to watch Milian get himself involved in the usual array of car chases, shootouts and brawls. Lenzi has got him riding a motorbike this time round, and every scene featuring it and Milian is a real standout! However, the film often feels like it doesn't really have anywhere to go, and this means that the running time is stretched out more than it should be. Compared to the crime films of other Italian directors, Syndicate Sadists is more than above average; but in relation to Lenzi crime flicks such as Almost Human and The Cynic, The Rat and The Fist - it doesn't stand tall as one of Lenzi's best. Still, if you're looking for ninety minutes of testosterone fuelled mayhem - Syndicate Sadists will suffice!
好无聊……
影片改编自真人真事。有时候可以是一个人的故事，也可能是一群人故事的片段。很长的铺垫，很短的故事结尾。到底讲述了什么？或者到底是个怎样的故事？其实都不那么重要。战争中的随机性，代价是生命。而生命的渺小，在战争中更是无足轻重。无论你是孩子、成人，还是修女，都是尘埃。
剧情太弱了，比《小丑回魂》差的不是一点半点啊；不仅是电话的意象old，作用都是一个，一点惊喜没有；如果当幻觉讲某几个孩子的提示根本胡扯，开门密码和砸墙不可能；ethan线就没展开讲；妹妹是蛮可爱的，但故事线就没用；这最后🍊破案结局扯到以为是➖鈡独占结尾……
最后妈妈狂奔回家这一路，我的心也纠了一路。
一部演绎70多年前丹麦被英军误炸的影片，竟然引出俄乌冲突的讨论。谁都知道打人是不对的，但有些人就是该打，这也是客观存在。凡事不能一概而论，装圣母也要分清人与事，否则都是无脑残。影片也引申出另外一个话题，谁有不如自己有，求人不如求己，要是丹麦自己的空军就不会那么粗心大意，也会对地形更加熟悉。求人办事可不就是这样，办好办赖，还都得跟人说声谢谢。看看乌克兰这次还能指望谁。6.6
需要用心感受的电影，本篇聚焦在经历战争中无辜的人，战争在她们心里留下的创伤，所见的阴影。战争和政治，大部分人都无力而为啊
二战中，英国皇家空军轰炸平民的悲剧。电影传达的主张就是:战争中，即便“正义”的一方也存在大量的屠戮妇女与儿童的行为。获胜的“正义”一方有时间炫耀自己的武功的话，倒不如想想自己有没有也犯下什么罪行。
一拍小成本就稳起来，无奈故事性太扯。★★★/6.1
我看了一遍，想说一点什么，发现好像并没有什么值得提及的，平庸之作。有两个细节：伊桑霍克演也挺真实的，另外导演长得和伊桑霍克差不多，我开始还以为是自导自演呢
一部根据真实历史事件改编的电影，能拍得如此失败，也真是少见。二战结束时，英军的误炸，导致近百人死亡，大多是孩子。如此事件，客观地平铺直叙，也会拍得让人震惊。该片导演却无谓地给故事增添了不少东西，视角又不断地转移，还一味地煽情，影片的叙事弄得乱糟糟的。如无必要，勿增实体。此片导演还真需要认真思考一下奥卡姆剃刀的原理。
笑着的，或哭着的孩子们，我们的未来戛然而止，剩下的故事被一颗颗炮弹画上了句号。
温和到波澜不惊，所以戛纳陪跑也不奇怪了。那个叫羽星的男婴一路上不哭不闹，好吃好睡，从容淡定，好像对自己的未来未卜先知。是个有福气的孩子。所以，是枝裕和是拍了个童话吗？
好无聊……
相当无聊。不是恐怖，惊悚类。妹妹的部分倒是很推荐，她有通灵能力，她爸说她妈也一样，最后把“假”当真，所以自杀了，妹妹说她喜欢妈妈的全部，这段对话就相当真实了。男主的爹假，这样的街区，妻子自杀，酗酒的男的，打起女儿来（觉得那段演得真假）像在克制演戏，之后还道歉，简直就很假，立不住的一个人物。哥哥被几个男的校园霸凌，妹妹冲上去很勇的打比她高年级的男的，用石块给他头来下（对比寺山修司某电影他没有出手帮她而是在门外等着暴行结束），如果反过来妹妹被打这个哥哥会不会冲出来真的不好说。拍个小男孩主角的都能反杀鲨人犯（看看他下手多干脆 还带着狗 把狗栓住就离谱），拍几个成年女性就不一定啥结局。配乐和面具和灵体（扭曲的），拍鲨人犯油腻的肚腩好几次这算是增加恶心元素了。等这么久就这?
7.10
孩子被丢弃，做转卖孩子的生意，买孩子，父亲的缺位。这下面有很多问题。
小心海鸥
我即便已经看够了人类的作茧自缚，但能不能稍微手下留情，不要再给孩子们的瞳孔蒙上阴影
开头空军扫射汽车那一段震惊到了，轰炸学校时爆炸的读秒声让人感受到绝望，颤栗。
丹麦二战影片。“战争中无辜的只能是贫民！”真实事件改编，英国皇家空军的误炸，造成哥本哈根一所教会学校学生老师的无辜死亡。结合当下的俄乌战争，又有多少老百姓在战火之中失去家园，妻离子散家破人亡痛苦的泪水与呼喊历历在目……推荐《我眼中的阴影》
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
